Saturday, September 18, 2010

Relaunch

I am relaunching Encephalo Ray. I've made a few changes in the blog's look, starting with the picture on top. That's the finger of Sean Craven, a good friend of mine. I forgot who owns those legs, and don't know the name of the moth Sean's holding. Sorry.

Encephalo Ray's purpose has changed. It used to be a comic book blog, now it's my personal website. I guess I could buy georgegaluschak.com, but Encephalo Ray sounds cooler. Besides, this way I get to keep the 60+ posts I made.

I will try to blog a few times a week, but make no promises. I moderate all comments, mainly because last year this site was invaded by porn-spewing Asian spambots. If you commented on one of my posts and I never answered, I apologize. I'll do better next time.

I think that's it.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Now I Have a Reason to Update

Strange Horizons has accepted my short story "Middle Aged Weirdo in a Cadillac."

The story will run in April/May 2010.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

My Watchmen review


Just saw the Watchmen.

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

Good first.

I liked the music. I was never bored. I thought the actors were very good. The guys who played Rorschach and Nite Owl nailed it (though I wish Nite Owl was fatter). I'd heard that the woman who played Silk Spectre was awful, but thought she did fine.

OK, that's the good.

So...is Z.S. kidding, or what? Was he trying to make a comedy, or did it just come out that way? There were parts (most having to do w/ Nite Owl's sex life) when I thought I was watching a Woody Allen movie. The violence was so over-the-top it bordered on being campy. And Archy's fiery ejaculations? Give me a break.

My first impression of the movie was right. This is back when I heard that they were making The Watchmen, before any of the pics came out. I thought that it wouldn't work because the characters would look stupid on the screen, and that's what happened. They're way too cartoonish, like the Batman TV show: the biting Moth Guy;the big blue CGI effect that talks like HAL on 2001; Richard Nixon with his Pinocchio nose; and the mighty Ozymandias, whose tiny little head is dwarfed by his ridiculous suit of nippled battle armor.

I hope Z.S. was trying to make a funny movie. Maybe he got confused and thought he was doing satire. My impression is that he would make a great horror movie director. No, that's not fair: I can tell he loves movies, and I must say that technically he's quite good. Maybe he'll make a cinematic classic some day; I don't know about that, but can definitely say that the Watchmen is NOT a cinematic classic.

The dialogue was awful; some of it made me cringe. I know a lot of it came straight from the gn, but they should have changed it. Z.S. took the source material way too literally, and missed the spirit of the gn. Look at the first Dark Knight movie: they changed Batman's origin from the comic book, but still captured the spirit of the character.

They shouldn't have nixed the squid. That was the totally awesome dumbest thing about the movie. Oh, Zack Snyder, why do you think Alan Moore used a squid? Because if he blew up a bunch of cities, like you did, the Americans and Russkies would assume it's a preemptive strike (they're at Defcon One) and let fly the nukes and it would be goodbye, Earth. There's no way they would wait to find out. Would you?

There were about ten people in the theater with me. Some left before the movie ended. I heard laughter, but not in the right places. Mark my words, The Watchmen will go down as a turkey. There's so much hype surrounding it people don't want to believe it's bad. It's like in the 90's when the first Star Wars prequel came out. People knew it was bad, but it took awhile for it to sink in.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Camelot 3000: comics of my lost youth


The 80’s were a magical time in Northern New Jersey, a decade of hair bands, The Breakfast Club and people driving around in cars with purple lights. For me, of course, it was all about the comics, and the 80’s produced some great material: series like Swamp Thing, JLI, The Suicide Squad, Grimjack and Camelot 3000.

Camelot 3000 came out while I was in high school. I recall this series as being truly awesome, so when I saw the hardcover for sale at B&N ($34.99; cheap!) I bought it and would have done so even if my issues weren’t all read to pieces. The first sign that my childhood memories might be – well, tainted, came from the introduction by Mike W. Barr (the writer). He was pretty honest in his assessment of the series. Nonetheless, I forged on and read the book.

(sound of shattering glass)

Oh, boy. O.K., let me start by saying that Camelot 3000 is very much a product of it’s time, that being the early 80’s. There are references to current events – Star Wars, the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Di, a gun-toting cowboy in the White House (the last sounds strangely familiar...). DC was still experimenting with what would become the Vertigo format; thus the better paper and a smidgen of adult material. The growed-up stuff is rather mild by today’s standards, amounting to PG language, a bit of tame sex and some lovely bare backs & bottoms.




The story is standard sci-fi/superhero/space Western fare. Aliens attack Earth in the year 3000. They hail from the tenth planet, and are led by Arthur’s half-sister Morgan le Fay. King Arthur awakens from his tomb, frees Merlin and reforms the Knights of the Round Table. His knights have all been reincarnated in different bodies. Sir Tristan is reborn as a woman; her lover, Isolde, is also a woman, which means Tristan spends most of the graphic novel sulking about not being a man. Lancelot and Guinevere continue their affair and are not even discreet about it. They are banished from Camelot, another member of the round table betrays Arthur, Merlin gets snatched by a nymph with serious overbite, the Holy Grail comes into play, the knights journey to the tenth planet and things end with a big bang. The end.

Camelot 3000 has flaws. Earth in the year 3000 resembles Earth of the late 20th century, except for flying machines and wondrous gadgets such as the Pro-Bar, which resembles a crowbar with an attached flashlight. The supporting cast is more interesting than the main character by a mile. While I usually complain about the plot not moving fast enough, Camelot 3000 moves too fast. Some interesting bits, like Arthur’s massacre of the infants and the interplay between the knights, are glossed over in favor of less interesting material. Faith in God is treated like a super power – I don’t understand how Lancelot, an adulterer, can use his faith to bring Guinevere back to life, or how Mordred can make the Holy Grail into a suit of armor.



There are some good parts, too. Merlin chews up the scenery and almost steals the show. The riddle of the Holy Grail is well-done, and precedes the very similar scene in the third Indiana Jones movie by a number of years. The test Arthur devises to discover the traitor in his midst is clever and he uses Excalibur in some awesome ways, most notably in the climax. The Knights of the Round Table come from all parts of the globe, and are a diverse lot. Back in the early 80’s diversity in superhero comics didn’t exist; come to think of it, that’s still true today.

But the best thing about Camelot 3000 is the art. Brian Bolland’s art elevates this series. Mike Barr is honest about the fact that he was learning on the job; he also admits that he took his source material a tad too seriously. Brian Bolland’s response was to send him a picture of Merlin holding up a rubber chicken, and the resulting “creative tension” (as Barr put it) between the two made Camelot 3000 a better book.



Brian Bolland can draw anything. As I reread Camelot 3000 I realized that most of my fond memories of this series revolve around the art. Bolland provides much-needed comic relief in the form of visual gags: the happy monkey; the man being skewered on Excalibur, bowler hat perfectly balanced on his head; the weirdness of Merlin’s lab. He also draws women very well; his illustrations of Queen Guinevere/Commander Acton made a big impression on my 14-year old self.

Bottom line: if you can get Camelot 3000 at your local library it is well-worth a read.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Watchmen discussion topics I'll miss


The Watchmen came out today. Thank God. Now I can finally see the damn thing.

Caleb Mozzocco, the writer of Every Day Is Like Wednesday, talks about how sick he is of hearing about the Watchmen. I disagree. With no more Watchmen hype, what will we talk about? Here are a few of the better Watchmen discussion topics I've seen on the Internet in the past few months.
  1. Doctor Manhattan's dong. First there was the condom kerfluffle. And then came the blog posts analyzing how well he was hung. Now the dong has hypnotic qualities; some people who have seen the movie report being unable to take their eyes off it.

  2. Alan Moore's feelings about The Watchmen movie. Well, he hates it. That's clear enough. He might be happy about the several million copies sold of the Watchmen graphic novel, and all the free publicity he's getting. I will buy League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: 1910 because I read an interview with Moore talking about it.

  3. Squid, or no squid? I think of it more as a post-Lovecraftian pseudopodian nightmare, but what do I know? And for the record: I think taking it out removes the point of the story.

  4. Is the movie faithful to the graphic novel? I've heard people say the movie's not faithful enough; others say it's too faithful. Make up your mind!

  5. Reviewers talking about their feelings about the Watchmen graphic novel. I did this, here, and it's one of those posts I wish I could take back. Brian Michael Bendis sums it up best (via Twitter)- attn movie reviewers: no one- i mean NO ONE gives a shit about your personal relationship to the watchmen GN.

  6. Casting. No clue about that. Aren't all the characters computer-generated nowadays?

  7. What Zach Snyder ate for dinner. Self-explanatory.

  8. Reviewers calling the characters by their first names. I didn't realize how many people were on a first-name basis with The Nite Owl. One reviewer kept referring to a character named Archie, who I never heard of. Turns out he was talking about The Nite Owl's ship. Oh. Is it just me, or is that a bit creepy?

  9. A Watchmen sequel? There will be lots of discussion about this in the upcoming weeks, bet on it.

  10. Is the Watchmen any good? We'll find out.

A site announcement

The writing process

I wrote a novel a few years ago. I didn’t outline beforehand. Some might call this lazy-ass writing; I called it organic process. It went like this: the characters are alive, I am merely a chronicler. Yes, I know; stop laughing. Thing is it sort of, kind of, definitely worked for me before, always with short stories.

I started writing January 2007. I had a beginning, a vague idea of an end and a bunch of characters. I took those characters off the leash and let them roam; fourteen months and over 1,000 hours later I had 70,000+ words of gibberish. Looking back, I’m amazed at my own naivete. But we all figure things out in our own way.

So I chalked it up as a learning experience, took a year off and now I'm writing another novel. This time I am doing a step outline before I write a word. I will still blog, not because of my huge audience, but because I like doing it. But my production might be erratic. I hope it is, because that means the novel is going well.

That is all.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Graphic novel wish list

If I had $150 to spare, this is what I'd buy...